While some argue for a cautious approach and greater oversight, others emphasize the potential benefits of AI and the need to continue advancing the technology. The controversy highlights the ongoing debate over the development of AI and its potential risks to society. The possibilities of the development of AI Meanwhile, researchers argue that there are already serious risks posed by the current use of AI, including its potential to influence decision-making related to climate change, nuclear war, and other existential threats. Critics have accused the FLI of prioritizing imagined apocalyptic scenarios over more immediate concerns about AI, such as racist or sexist biases being programmed into the machines. The letter was coordinated by the Future of Life Institute (FLI), a thinktank that has received funding from Musk’s foundation. Researchers Condemn Use of their Work in Letter However, some researchers whose work was cited in the letter expressed concern that their research was used to make such claims, and some signatories were revealed to be fake or later backed out of their support. The letter cited the potential risks posed by AI with “human-competitive intelligence” and called for safety protocols for advanced AI design and development that are rigorously audited and overseen by independent outside experts. Controversy over Letter Demanding Pause in AI Research Musk and Co-Signers Call for Six-Month Pause in AI DevelopmentĮlon Musk and a group of over 1,800 individuals, including Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak and cognitive scientist Gary Marcus, co-signed a letter demanding a six-month pause in the development of artificial intelligence systems more powerful than OpenAI’s GPT-4.
0 kommentar(er)
